Skip to content
Go back
Research paper

The use of Enhanced Vegetation Index for assessing access to different types of green space in epidemiological studies

Published:

Authors: Amy Mizen, Daniel A. Thompson, Alan Watkins, Ashley Akbari, Joanne K. Garrett, Rebecca Geary, Rebecca Lovell, Ronan A. Lyons, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Sarah C. Parker, Francis M. Rowney, Jiao Song, Gareth Stratton, Benedict W. Wheeler, James White, Mathew P. White, Sue Williams, Sarah E. Rodgers, Richard Fry

Abstract

Background

Exposure to green space can protect against poor health through a variety of mechanisms. However, there is heterogeneity in methodological approaches to exposure assessments which makes creating effective policy recommendations challenging.

Objective

Critically evaluate the use of a satellite-derived exposure metric, the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), for assessing access to different types of green space in epidemiological studies.

Methods

We used Landsat 5–8 (30 m resolution) to calculate average EVI for a 300 m radius surrounding 1.4 million households in Wales, UK for 2018. We calculated two additional measures using topographic vector data to represent access to green spaces within 300 m of household locations. The two topographic vector-based measures were total green space area stratified by type and average private garden size. We used linear regression models to test whether EVI could discriminate between publicly accessible and private green space and Pearson correlation to test associations between EVI and green space types.

Results

Mean EVI for a 300 m radius surrounding households in Wales was 0.28 (IQR = 0.12). Total green space area and average private garden size were significantly positively associated with corresponding EVI measures (β = < 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.0000, 0.0000; β = 0.0001, 95% CI: 0.0001, 0.0001 respectively). In urban areas, as average garden size increases by 1 m2, EVI increases by 0.0002. Therefore, in urban areas, to see a 0.1 unit increase in EVI index score, garden size would need to increase by 500 m2. The very small β values represent no ‘measurable real-world’ associations. When stratified by type, we observed no strong associations between greenspace and EVI.

Impact


Share this post on:

Previous Post
Using causal loop diagrams to develop evaluative research propositions: opportunities and challenges in applications to nature-based solutions
Next Post
Process and practice in New Zealand Enviroschool implementation